![Surfer [Jacob Willcox] criticizes WSL over environmental issues.](https://bombasurf.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/8b331125thumbnail-1024x576.jpeg)
Professional surfer Jacob Willcox has voiced strong criticism of the World Surf League (WSL) Challenger Series, expressing frustration with its current format and perceived lack of substance. His comments, described as an "expletive-laced screed," highlight a growing concern among some surfers about the direction of professional surfing and its connection to environmental issues.
Key Takeaways
- Jacob Willcox has publicly criticized the WSL Challenger Series.
- His remarks are linked to broader concerns about climate change and its impact on surf breaks.
- A recent study by the Save the Waves Coalition quantifies the economic value of surfing and the threat posed by sea-level rise.
Willcox’s Fiery Critique
While the specifics of Willcox’s critique of the Challenger Series are not detailed in the provided text, the context suggests his dissatisfaction stems from a perceived disconnect between the series and the core values of surfing, particularly in light of environmental challenges. The article contrasts the WSL’s commercial endeavors with more substantive issues facing the surfing community.
The Growing Threat of Climate Change to Surf Breaks
The article emphasizes the significant threat posed by climate change and rising sea levels to surf breaks worldwide. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, sea levels are rising at an increasing rate, with projections indicating substantial increases by 2050. This phenomenon directly impacts wave quality by altering tides and coastal geography.
Surfonomics and the Economic Value of Waves
A recent two-year study by the Save the Waves Coalition, in partnership with Black Surf Santa Cruz and funded by the Ocean Protection Council, has quantified the economic impact of surfing in the Santa Cruz area. The study, utilizing the concept of "Surfonomics," found that surfing around Santa Cruz’s 31 breaks generates $194 million annually. This research aims to demonstrate the significant economic value of healthy surf ecosystems to policymakers.
The Impact of Sea-Level Rise on Surf Economics
The Save the Waves report further illustrates a direct correlation between rising sea levels and diminished economic prosperity for surf-dependent communities. The findings indicate that even a one-foot rise in sea level could decrease surfable conditions at all 31 evaluated breaks. At a three-foot rise, more than half of these breaks could be significantly diminished or lost entirely, potentially leading to a 40% loss in annual revenue.
Calls for Action and Adaptation
Shaun Burns, a former WSL competitor and coalition coordinator, stated that the report’s goal is to spur action from California officials. The Save the Waves Coalition advocates for increasing the number of surf reserves statewide, prioritizing breaks based on climate adaptation, water quality, and equitable access. They also support legislation like AB 452, which would empower local governments to identify and conserve surf break ecosystems for their recreational and economic value.
Mitigation Efforts and Future Outlook
Beyond policy, tangible efforts are underway to mitigate the effects of changing coastal conditions. In Pacifica, activists and engineers are proposing the construction of an artificial reef to combat sand loss and failing break walls, aiming to preserve both coastal infrastructure and surf tourism revenue. However, experts like UC Santa Cruz professor Gary Griggs caution that while adaptation measures are important, the fundamental reality of climate change and rising sea levels necessitates acknowledging the moving edge of our coastlines and considering strategies like "managed retreat."
