Indigenous Fijian groups have voiced strong criticism against the World Surf League (WSL) on the eve of its Finals Day in Fiji, accusing the organization of exploiting the nation’s ocean and its people. Concerns center on the WSL’s long-standing relationship with the Fijian government, with local organizations arguing that the financial benefits do not adequately serve the impoverished population.
Exploitation Allegations
Two Fijian-based groups, Fiji Surf Co and Bath Protector, have labeled the WSL’s operations in the country as "exploitative." They claim that the WSL has been requesting millions from Fiji’s debt-stricken government for nearly 25 years. The groups assert that 95% of Fiji’s ocean and land is owned by resource custodians who are the guardians and protectors of these areas. They are calling for a "Pay to Play" model, arguing that the WSL, which profits from multi-million dollar sponsorships and broadcasting rights, should compensate the local communities for the use of their world-class waves. The groups emphasize that Fiji needs the WSL less than the WSL needs Fiji, as the latter brings global attention and economic activity.
Historical Context and Comparisons
This criticism echoes past discussions about the nature of professional surfing events held in pristine, remote locations. A similar sentiment was observed in a past event in the Mentawai Islands, where surfers prioritized free surfing and camaraderie over formal competition, leading to a renegotiation of the event’s structure. The article draws a parallel to the WSL’s previous decision to hold its Finals Day at Lower Trestles in California, which was criticized for being too accessible and not offering the dramatic, high-stakes environment expected for a world title decider.
Environmental and Economic Concerns
The groups highlight that Fiji is a nation where one in four citizens live below the poverty line, and the government should prioritize its own people over supporting international sports organizations. They express concern that the WSL’s presence, while providing temporary boosts to local businesses, leaves a "trail of destruction" and unfulfilled promises once the event concludes. The criticism also touches upon the broader issue of how "paradise" locations are utilized for commercial gain, questioning the sustainability and equity of such arrangements.
Key Takeaways
- Indigenous Fijian groups accuse the WSL of exploiting their natural resources and people.
- They demand a "Pay to Play" system, arguing the WSL profits significantly from Fiji’s waves.
- Concerns are raised about the Fijian government allocating funds to the WSL while a significant portion of the population lives in poverty.
- The situation draws parallels to past controversies regarding surf contests in remote, idyllic locations.
- There’s a call for greater respect for local communities and resources.
Sources
- WSL slammed by indigenous Fijian groups on eve of Finals Day for “exploiting Fiji’s ocean and people.” –
BeachGrit, BeachGrit.com. - Why a Surf Contest in Paradise Might Not Be Such a Good Idea, The Inertia.
